The Official Klout Blog

Understanding the Klout Score Part I

November 18th, 2011 by Joe Fernandez

This post begins a new “Understanding your Klout Score” series. Today, we review our recent changes and in the future we’ll dive more into your Score, networks, and tips on how to improve your Score.

It’s been an interesting few weeks here Klout. Now that we are finally catching our breath, I think this is a good opportunity to look back at what we’ve learned and discuss the changes we’ve made.

The way influence is signaled online is constantly changing. New networks are born and new behaviors emerge overnight. The Klout Score will continue to evolve to support this change. The Klout Score and Topics will always exist in a dynamic state of improvement.

We will be more transparent
Our biggest priority with the new scoring model was to increase transparency. We added some insights to show why your Score changed but this isn’t nearly enough. Given the passion our users have for their Klout scores, it is clear that we need to do more to help them understand why the Score has changed and what that Score means. To accomplish this, we are focusing nearly all of our efforts on projects that relate directly to the transparency of the Klout Score. The team is really fired up to share the tremendous amount of data and thought that goes into creating the Klout Score.

In the spirit of greater transparency, here are some in-depth examples to illustrate the three, primary improvements we made to the Klout algorithm on October 26th.

Greater equality of networks
In our previous Scoring model, the main driver of your Klout was a primary network (the one you’re best on) and, to be honest, your influence on secondary networks was too small a part of your Score. Now, a user who has two networks that are fairly equal in terms of participation and influence will see a greater parity in the way we score those two. Certainly, there may be more potential to be influential on a network with many millions of users like Twitter or YouTube, but we measure that influence equally wherever it occurs. That said, there is no score reward for just adding networks that you do not participate in.

Example: Consider two people who influence the same 100 people to the same extent. One person influences their network exclusively on Twitter. The other person influences two audiences of 50 equally on Twitter and Facebook. In practice, they have the same level of influence, and now they will have the same Klout Score as well.

Interactions must be taken in context
Likes, Retweets, and other interactions have always played a prominent role in the Klout algorithm. We believe these are valuable signals of influence. What we found though is that some people are extremely generous with these interactions. People should Like and Retweet to their heart’s content, but we believe that interactions need to be measured in the context of the person interacting. This was the most prominent reason why some scores dropped.

Example: Consider two users who Retweet my Tweet. User A Retweets me but she also Retweets 100 others in the same day. User B Retweets me and only me. We now consider these ratios in our algorithm and consider the singular Retweet as a greater sign of influence. Similarly, if you selectively only give out one Facebook Like a week and you choose to do so for my content, that is much more meaningful than if you Like 50 times a day.

Stability and consistency
Seeing the ebb and flow of your influence on a daily basis is helpful, but we also understand that your influence rarely makes huge jumps in short intervals of time. We considered massive spikes and steep drops as problems in the way our algorithm behaved. Our new algorithm makes the Klout Score more stable by taking a longer window of time (90 days instead of 30) into account when measuring your influence.

Example: We used to hear about “the vacation problem” where users saw a steep drop in their Klout if they took a break from social networks while they were off the grid. Now the Score will remain much more stable during short breaks from social media.

These are three of the main improvements in this algorithm change, but there are many more small improvements in this release. With this release, the average Klout Score is close to 20 and a Score of 50+ puts you in the 95th percentile. We now analyze 2.7 billion pieces of content and connections a day.

We are continually improving and solving new problems with our science team. We appreciate all your feedback and are working to help you better understand what goes into the Klout Score with this new series. Let us know what you think!

This entry was posted on Friday, November 18th, 2011 at 9:13 am and is filed under Understanding the Klout Score. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

  • Pingback: youtube video download

  • Chinmoy Sarkar

    We are all analogous species trying to unsuccessfully taste the beauty of this digital world. I am very surprised to see how mind participates in ranking when one receives good scores from Klout? I, a very intelligent entity is satisfied about Me who joyfully knows that his influence in the digital world is now getting updated day by day. What if I do not recognize it and I am not doing anything about it. I continue to do what I am passionately doing. I am letting my score stay exactly where it is supposed to be. 

    I am what I am and I am OK. We have the option to take it towards 100 or make it neutral that cannot touch me. I cannot be less than what I have already become. Let us live a life free of any influence from outside world. Let us not do anything about it. Who say, we live in a world influenced by 0 and 100. The flow goes beyond, far beyond what we can imagine with intellect…

  • Pingback: Actually, Klout is a great tool for hiring digital natives | VentureBeat

  • Pingback: Why you should be using Klout when making hiring decisions | Tin Surf24h

  • Pingback: Why you should be using Klout when making hiring decisions | Share Blog

  • Pingback: Actually, Klout is a great tool for hiring digital natives | MyTouch 4G Review

  • http://twitter.com/TechAssoc TechnologyAssociates

    OK – I don’t get it – We have a client with 32K followers, tweets at least five times daily, has a growing folliwng every day, is active on Facebook every day etc, etc. but his Klout score has dropped consistently in the preiod his followers went from 22k to 32k from 56/57 to 47.  Yet a friend of his has less than 60 followers tweets twice a week (total of 68 tweets in a year) yet has a score of 36.  Can someone please explain this anomaly – I don’t get it.

  • Geoff

    For as many problems as I see with Klout’s basic assumptions and scoring methodology, I have to point out that there is a serious flaw in your argument here.  You’re invoking the bell curve (normal distribution) in a way that seems entirely unsupported in principle.  There should only be a “bell curve” in influence scores if influence is actually normally distributed among the population.  There is no reason to believe, a priori, that this is true. 

    Rarely has influence been randomly apportioned in human societies.  We don’t know what the distribution ought to look like, it could have all kinds of skew (not to mention that a true normal distribution cannot be confined to a finite range, like 0-100, weird stuff starts happening near the endpoints; does Justin Bieber’s score of 100 mean he has the maximum POSSIBLE online influence? ).  Not knowing anything about the true distribution of influence, the most reasonable assumption, I’d say, would be that a few people have a lot of influence and most people have almost no influence at all.  That’s the way it’s always worked, and moving the stage to the internet hasn’t changed things as much as we might like to think.  We certainly are not justified in assuming that the average level of influence is exactly halfway between my grandmother and Justin Bieber.  Of course, this does raise the question of how a score of 50 is to be compared to a score of 75; it naturally invites a sort of logarithmic interpretation, but it’s not really clear.  Again, consideration of any one of these issues rapidly leads us to the others that need to be addressed.  

    I have no sympathy for HR people being confused by the score.  If they’re not ready to consider the very real issues of definitions and measurements that have to be addressed with this kind of score, they shouldn’t use it.  It clearly has major shortcomings and inconsistencies that anyone who gives it a moment’s thought should see.  If anything, showing the HR people the capriciousness of the metric might force them to think for a second about what they’re actually doing when they rely on this sort of thing.  If the HR people have such a poor understanding of social media, maybe they’d be better off restraining themselves to using more tangible measures of qualification.   
               

  • http://www.facebook.com/edteune Ed Teune

    Why Doesn’t Klout show me any stats for my Youtube account? I have hundreds of subscribers, get hundreds of comments and likes, etc.

    Ed

  • Michaelheasley

    Hi,

    I’m puzzled that my Klout influence: 
    for a topic I tweet on several times a day, 
    that I tag by topic hashtag on each tweet, 
    and that gets re-tweeted and favorited frequently 
    to a community of people who follow me on that specific topic
    shows up as my *lowest* topic of influence.
    And I’m much more influential on topics I have never tweeted about or shared on FB.
    Why is that?

    Thanks!

  • Pingback: Tips for tracking hard to measure qualities such as influence, trust and engagement | Jay Palter

  • Pingback: 5 Smart Reasons Why Nonprofit Organizations Should Not Hire Social Media Positions Based on Klout Scores « Know Your Own Bone – Nonprofit Marketing & Online Engagement

  • Pingback: Klout: What distribution do Klout scores form? - Quora

  • Pingback: | www.davidarodriguez.com

  • Pingback: What You Should Be Getting Out of Social Scoring Sites | MyBeak Social Media

  • Vic Torino

    My Klout score is 71. Is that good?

  • Pingback: Should Klout Drive Hiring Decisions? | Needle.

  • Pingback: KLOUT for Business – O poder dos “Key Influencers” ao serviço das Marcas « Cibertransistor.com